In sports, as in life, nothing lasts forever. That, in fact, is one of the core truths of being a sports fan. Your team won’t be at the top or the bottom forever (unless the team is the Cleveland Browns), your team won’t have the same owner(s) forever, or the same coach, or the same players. Change is inevitable, whether it comes as a result of trades, sales, career-ending injuries, old age, or even (god forbid) a franchise moving to a different city.

It’s also true that, as in life, some goodbyes in sports are easier than others. Maybe a player or club official torched their relationship with the fans a la Nico Harrison, formerly the general manager of the Dallas Mavericks. Maybe a player, despite being successful with a certain team, never truly felt like they belonged there, similar to Zlatan Ibrahimovic with Manchester United. Or maybe a player both never found success with a team and never felt like a good fit with that squad’s colors either, which was unfortunately the case with former Lion Josue Colman. In those cases, moving on from the team concerned wasn’t a particularly bitter pill to swallow because it was best for all parties involved: the player, the team, and the fanbase.

By contrast, some departures feel positively torturous even if they’re rooted in logic and make sense. Take the sudden medical retirement of Andrew Luck, or Thomas Muller leaving Bayern Munich after having been at the club since 2000. In Luck’s case, it felt like he had more to give on the field but his body simply wouldn’t hold up anymore, and retiring was the right choice for his health. Of course, it stung for fans of the Indianapolis Colts, but anyone with sense could hardly begrudge him for prioritizing his well-being.

For Muller, who was a couple weeks away from turning 36 when he signed with the Vancouver Whitecaps, Father Time was simply catching up to him. He made his fewest-ever starts for Bayern and played his fewest-ever minutes in the 2024-2025 season, and his number of starts had declined in every season since the 2021-2022 campaign. It hurt to see him go, but he wanted to keep playing, and to keep playing regularly, which simply wasn’t going to be possible for a side that is regularly in the latter stages of the UEFA Champions League each year.

What about the area in between the two extremes, though? What about a situation where a player is still doing some good things, is a good fit with the club, and could easily continue with that same team if the circumstances were just a little different? Saying goodbye in cases like that can be much more nuanced and confusing, and that’s what we’re here to talk about with relation to three of Orlando City’s recent departures.

Pedro Gallese

Let’s begin with the most high profile of the exits, which is that of the Lions’ former starting goalkeeper. Gallese had been with OCSC just under six years after he signed in January of 2020, and the good memories with El Pulpo are too numerous to count. From backstopping Orlando to a U.S. Open Cup championship in 2022 to taking over against Toluca in the Leagues Cup quarterfinal shootout this year and burying the winning penalty himself, the Peruvian international gave the club and its fans plenty to cheer for.

The fact remains though that while his save percentage ticked up from 66.7% in 2024 to 70.1% in 2025, his clean sheet percentage fell from 27.6% to 25%, his average goals against per 90 minutes went up from 1.34 to 1.53, and he failed to save any of the three penalty kicks he faced during the run of play, making 2025 only the second time in six seasons in which he did not save a spot kick outside of a penalty shootout.

To be clear, none of those drop-offs are particularly egregious, but the in-game statistics also aren’t the only factors in play. There’s also the fact Gallese will turn 36 in February and was on a base salary of $960,000. Even signing him to a new contract at the same exact number is a big ask for a goalie on the wrong side of 35, despite goalkeepers having the longest shelf life of any position on the field. We don’t know what numbers were thrown around during contract negotiations, but we know that the two sides ultimately couldn’t agree on one, and there’s no guarantee that either side was in the wrong. Gallese likely wanted either the same salary or an increase, while the club almost certainly wanted to bring him back at a cheaper base number with incentives tacked on.

You can’t fault the player for likely wanting to be paid at the same level or better, while you likewise can’t fault the club for being wary of investing a large sum into a soon-to-be 36-year-old when so much work needs to be done to the rest of the roster. It’s going to be strange not having him between the sticks, but ultimately his departure makes the most sense for both parties. If a cheaper number could have been agreed upon, then I’d have been happy to have him back, because I do think he’s still good enough to be a starting goalkeeper in this league, just not at his previous salary. It’s tough, because under the right circumstances a return could have gone very well, but those circumstances simply didn’t materialize.

Rodrigo Schlegel

The next highest-profile departure is that of Rodrigo Schlegel. Like Gallese, the Argentinian center back spent six seasons as a Lion after being signed on Dec. 30, 2019, but he has now joined Liga MX’s Atlas via a transfer. While nominally a backup, he somehow always seemed to find himself in a starting role in place of either Antonio Carlos, Robin Jansson, or David Brekalo. Like Gallese, there were plenty of highs where Schlegel is concerned. He was a key contributor on the run to lifting the U.S. Open Cup, and don’t even get me started on the “Papi, I can do that” save on Gudmundur Thórarinsson’s penalty kick in Orlando City’s first-ever MLS playoff match. Like the goalkeeper he played in front of for so long, his time on the field was defined by passion, tenacity, and a willingness to give everything he had for the shirt.

The tricky thing with Schlegel was that he was maddeningly inconsistent, and his positional discipline could be…interesting at times. Too many times to count he would charge from his spot in the back line to attempt a tackle or an interception, and when it worked, it neutered dangerous attacks before they could even materialize, but when it didn’t, the Lions had an unfortunate habit of giving up goals as a direct result. He seemed to waver from being too good to be a backup yet too error prone to be a starter for a team with true championship aspirations.

Add in the fact that his base salary was $500,000 and multiply it with Orlando City not keeping a clean sheet after the month of June, and things start coming into clearer focus. While the club did not disclose how much the transfer was for, Transfermarkt lists it at €2 million, which would be a significant profit on the €410,000 that the site says it took to sign him from Racing Club. If those numbers are accurate or even roughly in the right ballpark, that’s another piece of the puzzle that can’t be ignored. As mentioned above, the roster needs to be reshaped, and having over a million extra in transfer fees and an additional $500,000 in salary budget isn’t going to hurt. It would be hard to justify keeping that much salary on the books for a guy who hasn’t consistently played at the level needed for a starter, but given the passion he played with and the brilliance he was capable of producing, it doesn’t make the departure an easy one to accept.

Kyle Smith

Though it may seem odd to some readers, this is easily the off-season departure that hurt me the most. Kyle Smith was signed all the way back in December of 2018, when he came onboard with James O’Connor, who had been his coach at Louisville City. No one at the time could have predicted he would play seven seasons with the Lions and finish second on the all-time list for appearances, and sixth and fifth for starts and minutes, respectively. That’s precisely what happened though, and after Mason Stajduhar’s departure in January of this year, Smith was the longest-tenured player on the team with Robin Jansson next on the list.

While Smith didn’t play with the visible ferocity of Schlegel, and might not have provided the sort of dramatics fans saw from Gallese, what he did provide was a versatility that at times bordered on the bewildering. During his time as a Lion, The Accountant appeared at damn near every position on the field except goalkeeper, and one can’t help but suspect that if he’d been called upon to don the gloves a la Schlegel, he would have found a way to do a perfectly serviceable job. Smith brought a level of reliability and flexibility that stood the Lions in good stead when the injury bug reared its ugly head, international breaks left the roster threadbare, and fixture congestion necessitated rotation. The 2025 campaign even saw him match his highest assist total in a season with the team, as he contributed three helpers while notching his best passing accuracy.

The issue with Kyle was likely twofold. For one, he’ll be 34 in January, and for another, he had a base salary of $270,000 in 2025, and a guaranteed compensation of $318,000. I am not joking in the slightest when I tell you that Smith is one of my favorite all-time Lions, but that’s simply a lot of money for a defender (by trade) that only made 12 starts this past season, especially when that defense gave up 51 goals in 34 games. It’s also likely that Smith was looking for an increase on his 2025 contract, and it would be tough to justify giving even more money to a guy who, if things go according to plan in 2026, should be a backup/rotational player. If he could have been brought back for cheaper or on an incentive-heavy deal then it would have made sense for the club, but likely not for the player. When that’s the situation, a parting of the ways is usually the solution.

I look at all three of these departures through the lens of a breakup. Ending any romantic relationship is rarely easy, but it tends to be slightly less difficult if its evident that things are bad. While it might not be fun breaking things off, it’s likely an easier change to come to terms with if your partner is being unfaithful, has gambled your life savings away at the horse races, or hates your family so much that they intentionally ran your parents over with their car.

By contrast, its much more difficult to decide to end things and process that decision when the relationship isn’t overwhelmingly horrible, but rather just isn’t right. When there are plenty of good things about the person and about the two of you together, but for some reason the relationship just isn’t clicking. That’s when things are hardest, because you can see how good the two of you could be together…if only the circumstances were a little different. Except, the circumstances aren’t different; the situation is what it is. They’re the person they are and they want what they want, while you’re the person you are and you want what you want; and the two of you simply aren’t meshing the way that you used to.

For me, that’s how it is with each of these three long-serving Lions. Saying goodbye to Gallese, Schlegel, and Smith would be so much easier if their performances had nosedived off a cliff, they’d become combative and hostile with fans, or they were retiring due to medical concerns or old age. That isn’t the case though, and it means that these farewells are complicated ones.

Freeing up the salary space they occupied will allow the club to rebuild and hopefully reach new levels of success, but it’ll be strange not having them around if/when that success does come. Still, they each brought us plenty of good times, and we’ll always have those times to look back on fondly. For one reason or another though, it simply doesn’t work for them to continue with Orlando City anymore, no matter how much them, the club, and the fans might have wanted them to.

If it hurts to end a relationship, that’s how you know it meant something. Saying goodbye to Pedro Gallese, Rodrigo Schlegel, and Kyle Smith hurts like hell, there’s no way around it. You can be damn sure though, that their time here meant something. Vamos Orlando.

We still have a long way to go until opening day of the 2026 Major League Soccer season, and a lot of work needs to be completed on Orlando City’s roster between now and Feb. 21, but there have been some encouraging developments so far.

For starters, the club inked captain Robin Jansson to a new deal. That takes care of at least one of the starting center back positions, potentially two if David Brekalo partners him, with Adrian Marin or someone else sliding in at left back. Aside from filling an obvious positional need, it also returns a veteran who (if Kyle Smith isn’t re-signed) is the longest-tenured player on the team and is someone who has experience coming out of his ears. For a roster that is going to experience a fair amount of overhaul this offseason, having a constants is important, especially when it comes to leadership both on the field and in the locker room.

That brings to an end the confirmed news when it comes to incoming/returning players, but there have been plenty of rumors gaining traction when it comes to Orlando City making signings. Tom Bogert has had a lot to say about incoming Lions transfers this week, and all of them should be encouraging to Orlando fans. Mr. Scoops reported that OCSC is finalizing a deal to sign 20-year-old Brazilian winger Tiago as an MLS U22 Initiative player, while also mentioning that a deal to sign 18-year-old midfielder Luis Otavio is still in the works.

Those would both be welcome signings, as Orlando needs capable bodies in central midfield behind presumable starters Eduard Atuesta and Wilder Cartagena. The fact that the Lions are reportedly shelling out $3.5 million to land Otavio suggests that if he can adapt well to his new surroundings, he might well push for more than just backup minutes before too long; and with Cartagena set to turn 32 in September, it’s good that Orlando is looking to find a young (eventual) replacement.

Then there’s Tiago, who will reportedly cost $4 million and is set to take up a valuable U22 Initiative slot. It’s no secret that the Lions badly needed more offensive production from the left winger position in 2025, and if/when Tiago does arrive, it presumably spells the end of Ivan Angulo’s time in Orlando while leaving the Brazilian and Tyrese Spicer to duke things out for a starting role.

That brings us to departures from the club. This week alone has seen young center back Thomas Williams traded to Nashville SC for the Coyotes’ first-round pick in the upcoming MLS SuperDraft, while Dagur Dan Thorhallson was traded to CF Montreal on Wednesday. The Lions got a tidy $500,000 in General Allocation Money for Dagur Dan, and while there was no player who immediately came the other way in the deal, that GAM will be very helpful in getting the club roster compliant for 2026. It’s no secret that the Lions are in the market for a new goalkeeper, and although Dayne St. Clair is probably too expensive, a guy like Carlos Coronel is a good fit on paper with Orlando City’s overwhelmingly South American stylings, but GAM will be needed to pay down a new face between the sticks.

It of course hurts to lose Thorhallsson, who was a capable and versatile servant during his time in Orlando, but the signing of Otavio and growth of Colin Guske, combined with what the (injured) Joran Gerbet showed in 2025, means that he was going to be a backup. Likewise, the emergence of Alex Freeman means he wasn’t going to be the starting right back, and even if Smith isn’t re-signed to be a backup fullback/utility man, the front office may feel that Zakaria Taifi is primed to take a step forward. We also can’t forget that the club has a whopping four first-round draft picks to play with this year and may look to find depth in that manner as well.

If you didn’t closely read the Bogert social media post earlier in this article, you may have missed the blurb at the end about OCSC closing in on a sale of Rodrigo Schlegel to Liga MX side Atlas. The fee is said to be in the neighborhood of $600,000, which means that Orlando will turn a profit on the center back. It’ll be a bittersweet parting if/when his departure becomes official. Schlegel has been an extremely capable backup center back for this team and has showed flashes of consistent starter-level play during the last several seasons, not to mention that save in a penalty shootout so many years ago.

The hard facts though, are that at 28 years of age, the Argentine defender isn’t likely to reach a significantly higher level of play than he’s at now, and his current level of play isn’t consistently at the required quality for a team with true championship aspirations. While it’ll be hard to say goodbye, the right decision at this point is probably to collect on your investment, and try to find either a young player that can be developed or an established veteran that’s a known MLS quantity.

Bogert has also stated that Orlando is in the mindset of wanting to move on from Luis Muriel. If the club is able to do so, it’ll free up a Designated Player spot while bringing an end to an experiment that showed plenty of promise, and wasn’t without its high points, but ultimately can’t be considered a successful one. After his hot start to 2025 faded into more of the inconsistency he displayed in 2024, it became clear that new blood at striker is needed, and it’s good to see that the front office feels the same way.

This isn’t all to say that the off-season has been a resounding success so far. After all, very little has actually been officially done to reshape the roster as of this writing. But there seem to be a number of moves nearing completion, and we’re hearing all the right things when it comes to areas of the field like goalkeeper and striker. Even if the players that get brought in don’t all work out, it’s just good to see that changes are in fact being made. The roster was mostly left intact after the 2024 season, and a lack of depth in several areas, combined with some unfortunate injury luck, doomed a once promising season.

It’s far too early to know whether or not the 2026 campaign will be better or not, but the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results. So far, the early signs point to Lions’ fans not needing to worry about any such insanity this off-season. Vamos Orlando!

Orlando City’s 2026 schedule has been out for a little over two weeks now, and I’ve had ample time to look over it, analyze it, and zero in on some games that I’m really looking forward to next year. There are always the usual suspects in the mix like home rivalry matches against the likes of Atlanta and Miami, but I didn’t want to focus on those obvious ones, so they won’t be included here.

Saturday, Feb. 21 vs. New York Red Bulls

Orlando City’s streak of playing a home match to open the season will somehow reach 12 seasons in a row when the Lions kick off the 2026 season against the New York Red Bulls. It’ll be our first chance to see OCSC in a competitive game during the new season, and after an off-season that will likely contain a fair amount of turnover, I for one will be even more anxious than usual to get a look at what sort of product we’ll be seeing on the field. The Red Bulls will also look different, as they’ll have a new manager and a good amount of new players after missing the postseason for the first time since 2009. This is probably my most obvious choice of the bunch, but I think it’s hard to fault me for being excited about a new season!

TBD U.S. Open Cup Match

There’s only a 50% chance that this will be a home game, but personally I’m just glad to see Orlando City in the U.S. Open Cup again. There’s obviously some good history with the club in the competition, but aside from that, I just generally think that the tournament should get more love and a bigger platform than it currently does. While I’d have obviously been thrilled if OCSC had managed to win Leagues Cup in 2025 and come away with a trophy, I’d have much preferred the Lions to make a deep run in the Open Cup, considering the rich history of the competition as a whole, in addition to what it means to Orlando specifically. The fact that defending champion Nashville SC isn’t in the field is mind boggling to me, but I’m damn happy that the Lions are.

Saturday, Sept. 12 vs. Toronto FC

Now I can understand why you might be surprised by this one, as Toronto isn’t exactly considered one of Orlando City’s rivals. This year’s Decision Day match left a bad taste in my mouth though. Was it less about what Toronto did on the field, and more about OCSC basically neglecting to show up to the field to begin with? Maybe. Do I care? No. Do I want vengeance and the ability to erase a pitiful performance from my mind all in one fell swoop? Absolutely. I need the scales to be balanced and for my own personal demons from the final day of the season to be exorcised, and the fact that I’ll be able to be in the stands to have that chance is all the more appealing.

Saturday, Nov. 7 vs. New England Revolution

Decision Day is (usually) a fun affair regardless of whether the match is home or away. Wild swings in the standings from minute to minute, nerves, and hopefully reason to celebrate when it’s all over. There’s just something about having all that happen at home, though. I’ve been in The Wall for plenty of Decision Days at this point, and the energy is just a little different than a normal regular-season game. Similar to home openers, the air almost crackles with the excitement of possibility and anticipation of what things are going to look like when the dust settles. Of course, there’s always the possibility of things going wrong and the Lions ending up low in the playoff standings or out of the postseason altogether, but we’ll cross that bridge if/when we come to it.

What games are you especially looking forward to next season? Be sure to let us know down in the comments. Vamos Orlando!