Connect with us

Uncategorized

Evaluating the New MLS Playoff Structure

Published

on

On Dec. 17 of last year, Major League Soccer announced that it would be switching to a new playoff format and new playoff scheduling starting in 2019. The competitive changes involved 14 teams making the playoffs instead of 12, with only one team receiving a first-round bye; a fixed bracket with no re-seeding; and the switch to a single-elimination format for the entire duration of the postseason. Scheduling-wise the playoffs would now be shorter than in years past, with the entirety of the postseason taking place between the October and November international breaks.

The changes were intended to do a number of different things. First, the move to a 14-team playoff field was made with an eye towards MLS expanding to 28 teams in the very near future. The decision to do away with two-legged ties was intended to both make the playoffs more exciting, and shorten the overall duration of the postseason. That also played into the league putting the playoffs in between two international breaks, so that teams wouldn’t potentially be missing players, and also provided continuity throughout the run of the playoffs for both teams and fans instead of having things broken up by the November international break. A final (even though not explicitly stated) reason for the changes was to try to attract a wider and more casual audience to the league, and provide a showcase for the growth of MLS in America. The question is: did it work?

The first thing to look at is the playoff field itself. Plenty of people suggested that letting in seven teams from each conference would result in bad teams making the postseason and lower the overall quality of play. I don’t think that was the case whatsoever. All but one of the first-round games in the playoffs this year was decided by one goal, with the outlier being a 5-1 thrashing that Toronto FC handed out to D.C. United in a game that only really got out of hand during extra time. That’s exactly the same number of lopsided games as 2018, with the one game that was decided by more than one goal being between New York City FC and the Philadelphia Union — a game that finished 3-1 in favor of New York. Throughout the rest of the 2019 playoffs the quality of play has remained pretty high. There were some eye-popping scores in the form of a 5-3 LA Galaxy defeat to LAFC and a subsequent 3-1 LAFC loss at the hands of the Seattle Sounders, but none of the teams looked truly outmatched against their opponents. For me, adding another team from each conference has worked out just fine.

The next item on the list concerns excitement, and overall entertainment value. Doing away with two-legged ties in the conference semifinals and conference finals was done with an eye towards jazzing up the playoffs and making them more exciting, which is something that probably needed to be done. Between the 2018 conference semifinals and conference finals there were three 1-0 wins, and one each of a 1-1 draw and 0-0 draw, accounting for five games out of the total 12 that could be classified as “boring” if you simply go by the scoreline.

Furthermore, all but one of those “boring” games took place in the first leg of the tie as a result of teams coming out cautious and being afraid to make too many mistakes and thereby finding themselves in a hole when it came to aggregate goals. Compare that to this year, where there’s been a solitary 1-0 win throughout the entire duration of the playoffs, nine games out of 12 where the teams have combined for at least three goals, and an absolute slew of late goals — with the first round in particular packed to the gills with drama.

Obviously there can’t be any draws in the single-elimination format, but the dearth of 1-0 wins is certainly a good sign. Goals per game are also up in the playoffs, with an average of 3.13 scored in 2018 and 3.5 in 2019. It remains to be seen if that trend continues in the MLS Cup final, but early returns are good. I’m not suggesting that the 1-0 wins and pair of draws were all dull games, but few soccer fans would disagree that goals make games more exciting, and going by that (admittedly somewhat simple) logic, 2019 passes the test again.

That brings us to scheduling. Last year, the first round of the playoffs began on Oct. 31, with the MLS Cup final taking place Dec. 8 — meaning that the playoffs took a total of four and a half weeks. That’s a long time, especially compared to this year, which saw the first round start on Oct. 19 with the final coming up on Nov. 10, clocking in at three weeks and one day. Obviously it’s shorter, but the fact that the playoffs are no longer bisected by the November international break is something that shouldn’t be overlooked.

In the past it was just a little awkward, with the last game of the conference semifinals taking place on Nov. 11 and the conference finals not starting until two full weeks later on Nov. 25 in order to accommodate the international window. While there’s a week and a half break this year between the conference finals and the MLS Cup final, it’s time off that makes sense. The teams have ample time to prepare for each other, get healthy, and try to ensure that they’ll be able to give their best performances in the most important game of the season. It’s a break by choice rather than necessity, and one that certainly makes sense. The shorter, more coherent playoffs are a win in my book.

Finally, that brings us to the state of MLS and the league’s goal to continue to attract new and wider American audiences. While the growth of the league wasn’t explicitly stated as a reason for the format switch, it isn’t hard to connect some dots and see that it probably played a least a small part in the final decision. Average casual fans aren’t going to put their butts in seats only to witness a 0-0 draw, or even a 1-0 win that sees the team with the goal putting 11 men behind the ball to protect their aggregate score. Plus the two-legged nature of the conference semifinals and conference finals didn’t have the same level of stakes as the new single-elimination format. While the aggregate score format certainly provided us with some memorable moments, win or go home is simple and provides a greater sense of urgency to get to the stadium and see your team.

It’s also an easier format to digest. While grasping the concept of aggregate scores and away goals isn’t particularly difficult, those things aren’t done in any other mainstream American sport, and doing away with them only serves to Americanize soccer and make it more digestible for a domestic audience. There are some numbers to back up that it’s working too — according to a recent article by Forbes, average playoff attendance is at 31,100 this year, up from 26,343 in 2018. And while some of that increase can be attributed to teams with large and passionate fan bases like Atlanta, Seattle, and Toronto making deep runs, it’s also worth noting that the lowest attendance at a playoff game this year was only 17,452 at Real Salt Lake’s game against the Portland Timbers.

Add in the fact that there were 12 smaller crowds at playoff games from 2015-2018 and it seems that the switch has had the desired effect of attracting fans in greater numbers. It remains to be seen whether or not the trend continues, but early results are positive, so it passes the last test.

All in all, the switch seems to be working out very well for Major League Soccer — at least according to the four points I outlined. Quality of play remains high despite adding two more teams, goals per game have increased, and 1-0 wins are scarcely anywhere to be found. The postseason is shorter and no longer has to cater to an international break, and average attendance is up. While only time will tell whether or not the positive trends continue, for the first year of the new playoff format it’s so far, so very, very good.

Uncategorized

A Few Words About the Future of The Mane Land

TML needs help to continue bringing you coverage of Orlando City, the Orlando Pride, OCB, and all things soccer related in the City Beautiful.

Published

on

Stock image courtesy of GoDaddy.com Managed WordPress

For the last 11 years, The Mane Land has worked hard to provide daily content telling the story of Orlando City SC, the Orlando Pride, OCB, and any other soccer-related events we can get to in the Central Florida area. We love doing that, but we’re at a critical stage in being able to do so. Staff has been difficult to replace in recent years, and we’ve come to a point where some of us have not only been stretched to an unsustainable limit, but we’ve been going at that rate for multiple years without a break.

To that point, TML is now at a critical juncture where we must have more contributors who can cover live events in order to survive in our current format (and possibly at all). For the past few years, we have had only two primary game night writers covering three teams, and we are unable to continue at that pace, regardless of how much we enjoy doing it.

To continue as an entity, we’re going to need anywhere from two to four new contributors who can pitch in with game-night coverage of Orlando City/Orlando Pride matches. Additionally, another copy editor is essential, while two more would be preferred.

We’d like to continue into 2026, but if we can’t get the additional help we need, the current plan is to shut down at the end of the 2025 calendar year. The minimum we need to carry on would be two new live event writers and a copy editor.

What does this mean? Well, if you’ve ever thought it would be cool to cover soccer matches (it is) or thought about joining us, now is the time to volunteer. If you enjoy soccer and talking about this club with your friends, you might be perfect for our team, because if you can talk about soccer, you can probably write about it as well. Writing is just talking on a screen with your fingers, after all.

To get started, please write to us at themaneland@gmail.com and let us know how you’d like to contribute — writing, editing, etc.

It is important to note that we do this out of a love for the beautiful game and these positions are on a voluntary basis. However, if freed from the shackles of such an overwhelming schedule, my goal is to spend more time creating strategic partnerships and promoting our membership platform that could combine to bring in revenue that would go toward compensating staff writers. Additionally, some of our staff members have gone on to more financially rewarding opportunities as a result of their time with us. You never know what this experience will lead to. Like anything else in life, you’re likely to get out of it what you put in.

The good news is that we have already reached out to our Founders and our Buy Me a Coffee subscribers about this subject, and several have shown an interest in helping, so we are in the process of exploring those potential contributors at the moment.

We Are Currently Seeking:

  • Match writers – You don’t need a degree in journalism or English to write for us. If you like to talk about soccer, you can probably write about it as well. Staff writers contribute regularly to our game coverage, which could be in the form of recaps, player grades pieces, five takeaways posts, etc. We have a need for this on both the Orlando City and Pride sides, and you can do both if you want. If you’re not local to the Orlando area, you can cover road matches via the broadcast/stream.
  • Editors – Can you spot a subject/verb disagreement from a mile away? An editor position may be for you! How often do you get to correct people without anyone shaming you for it? This position will edit copy for submitted stories, make headlines punchier and more SEO-friendly, and ensure the story has a properly cropped/centered photo that helps tell the story. Typically you’ll only be on “desk duty” one or two evenings per week when it fits your schedule. You may also write stories if you wish!

About TML

Our little blog became an idea and then an independent WordPress site in late September of 2014, and went live on SBNation in December of that year. When SBNation stopped funding nearly all of its MLS blogs a few years ago, we went independent again, and we’ve long been the only outlet providing daily coverage of Orlando City’s teams. Even the club doesn’t post new content to its website every day!


FAQ

Why shutter the site at the end of December? Why do you need help now when the season doesn’t start for a couple of months?

Preparing to cover three teams requires advance planning. Each year, we put together a publication schedule to ensure all our bases are covered. This includes what will run (a placeholder or sometimes the specific piece) on every day of the year, which obviously doesn’t take into account breaking news or extra features that people want to do. Setting up this publication schedule also includes noting when major soccer events are coming, known USMNT/USWNT scheduled matches, MLS and NWSL deadlines, player birthdays, important milestones and anniversaries, and more. We also put together volunteer sign-up sheets for grades and takeaways posts. That setup work is all for naught if we don’t have the bodies to physically cover the team when the season starts. Also, it’s easier to pull the plug on our LLC at the end of a calendar year. None of us want to stop, but we have to be realistic about being able to continue covering the team as we have.

Why not just scale back and cover what you can? Do you have to cover every game?

I don’t have a good answer for this other than I would not feel right about putting my name on a product I don’t believe in. I don’t ever want our audience to have to guess whether or not they’re getting a game recap or any follow-up analysis from a given match. In my opinion, we have never had the personnel to fully provide what I envision. For example, I want to add more video content, player grades and recaps for the Pride games, and to bring back weekend Lion Links and OCB match previews. And we should have a lot more features and analysis pieces! In short, we’re already doing the bare minimum that I’m comfortable with. And, I have to be honest: if there was a game coming up with no one to cover it, knowing me, I’d probably just do it myself, and I already know I can’t continue the pace of the past few years. I have to save me from myself sometimes.

Could The Mane Land continue in a different form?

I have toyed with the idea of turning TML into a newsletter. This might be a daily that includes a Lion Links-type section and opinion/analysis of club news. It would not include match coverage or any kind of regular news. I almost pivoted to that when SBNation stopped funding us, but we decided to make a go of it as an independent outlet. The problem with the newsletter style is that I can’t do it daily every single day or it would be no different than the situation I’m in, so some help would still be needed. Some of that could come from the current TML staff, but I’m not sure all of it could, and the newsletter format is not for everyone, so we’d be leaving part of our audience behind. I’m not sure it’s the way to go.

Is new management or investment needed?

Possibly. I am willing to sell the name and logo and turn over all our passwords for someone else to take over the operations, which would free up a considerable amount of my time. I’m even willing to continue on as a writing and editing contributor, because I love covering the club. Some of the other staff might as well. But I would not be interested in covering every single match. I’m not a kid anymore, and I have a regular job, a family, and other side gigs that require my attention.

Will you still do the podcasts if the site shuts down?

No. I think if we decide to shut down, it will be across the board. I much prefer our written content, and that’s the reason I started our outlet to begin with. I feel the podcasts complement our coverage and give us more of an opinion platform and a way to discuss matches in a deeper, richer way, but I’m not interested in doing only the podcasts. That said, others on our staff might want to continue and I’m OK with that.


Contact us at themaneland@gmail.com today to get started as a new contributor!

Continue Reading

Podcasts

PawedCast Episode 506: Cincinnati Rewind, OCB-Carolina Core, Columbus Preview, and More

The Lions claimed a late draw at Cincy and now host Columbus while OCB’s playoff hopes hang by a thread.

Published

on

Image of Alex Freeman celebrating after scoring the tying goal at Cincinnati.
Image courtesy of Orlando City SC / Jeremy Reper

Orlando City left it late again. Tyrese Spicer reprised his role from the Nashville game by providing the assist for a goal late in stoppage time, but this time it was a different goal scorer and a road draw instead of a home win. Alex Freeman played great against FC Cincinnati, so it was fitting that he literally pulled a point out of thin air on a Sunday night that saw the Lions squander numerous good opportunities to score while allowing the hosts only one Kevin Denkey strike.

We look back at the key moments, players, and plays of a critical road match, check our score predictions, and make our selections for Man of the Match, splitting the vote

This week’s mailbagbox asked us a pair of trivia questions and added an individual question for each host. Remember, if there’s anything — and we do mean anything — you want us to address on the show, just ask us by tweeting it to us at @TheManeLand with the hashtag #AskTMLPC, or hitting us up on Bluesky Social with that same hashtag.

OCB got two points at Carolina Core FC when it needed three, but it did enough to stay alive in the postseason race but there is no margin for error. The Young Lions fell behind by two goals, battled back to get level, conceded again, and once again equalized on the road. Carlos Mercado then helped his team win the penalty shootout on his birthday to claim the extra point. OCB must beat FC Cincinnati 2 on Sunday at home and get help to reach the postseason.

Finally, Orlando City returns home with another game against a good team from the Buckeye State, as the Columbus Crew visits Inter&Co Stadium on Saturday. Whether Diego Rossi plays or not, the Crew are always a difficult opponent. We break down the series history, look at the battle ahead, provide our key matchups, and make our predictions for the final score.

Be sure to rate and review our show wherever you get your podcasts. Remember, we’ll read any five-star reviews we get on Apple Podcasts on the next show.

If you’d like to support our independent writing and podcasting efforts, we’d love to have you as a subscriber or donor over at our Buy Me a Coffee site.


Here’s how No. 506 went down:

0:15 – Orlando City didn’t seem to want to put the ball in the net, but maybe that’s because it wasn’t yet the death of stoppage time. Earlier goals are OK too, guys!

27:55 – The mailbagbox offers trivia, but no prizes if we get them right.

39:11 – OCB was listening to Meat Loaf and thinking two out of three ain’t bad, and the senior Lions prepare for Columbus.

Continue Reading

Podcasts

PawedCast Episode 502: Galaxy Rewind, Ramiro Enrique Transfer News, OCB Defeats Crown Legacy, and More

Lions leave Leagues Cup empty handed, Ramiro Enrique could be on the move soon, OCB gets a vital win, and more

Published

on

Image of Oscar Pareja giving his team directions.
Image courtesy of Orlando City SC / Mark Thor

I couldn’t tell you why this show is nearly an hour other than the fact that we are verbose. Orlando City crashed out of Leagues Cup with back-to-back losses in games that had a Concacaf Champions Cup berth on the line. The Lions did almost nothing in the first half against the LA Galaxy on the road, and threw Martin Ojeda’s second-half equalizer away just seven minutes after he scored it with a horrendous turnover in their defensive third.

We discuss Orlando City’s 2-1 road loss, which featured one of Pedro Gallese’s best-ever saves as a Lion, although it ultimately didn’t matter much, looked back at our score predictions, and made our selections for Man of the Match.

We also discussed Seattle’s 3-0 win over Inter Miami in the final and the shenanigans that the Herons pulled after losing.

Ramiro Enrique was not in uniform Sunday night in the wake of reports that he’s about to be sold for a reported $3 million to a Saudi team. Although the timing isn’t perfect, it would be a good return for the Argentine striker.

This week’s mailbagbox asked about ice cream, donuts, Carlos Mercado vs. Javier Otero, and more. Remember, if there’s anything — and we do mean anything — you want us to address on the show, just ask us by tweeting it to us at @TheManeLand with the hashtag #AskTMLPC, or hitting us up on Bluesky Social with that same hashtag.

OCB picked up a much-needed three points with a home win over Crown Legacy at the death that nearly immediately became a draw at the even more death. Mercado was sensational in the match for the Young Lions and Thalles scored the timely goal to push the club over the playoff line for the time being. I nearly started to preview an OCB game that is more than a week ago, but the important thing is I stopped myself, otherwise the show would have been even longer.

The senior Lions are also off this week, so we’ll see you next week!

Be sure to rate and review our show wherever you get your podcasts. Remember, we’ll read any five-star reviews we get on Apple Podcasts on the next show.

If you’d like to support our independent writing and podcasting efforts, we’d love to have you as a subscriber or donor over at our Buy Me a Coffee site.


Here’s how No. 502 went down:

0:15 – Orlando City looked to be following the same script as in the win at LA back in March, but then coughed up the ball in a dangerous spot to one of the Galaxy’s best scorers.

29:36 – The mailbagbox is trying to make us fat(ter).

46:38 – OCB has put together two consecutive late wins as the Young Lions try to get back into playoff contention after several rough weeks.

Continue Reading

Trending